CSR+ Urban Organic Recycling Project

Community Rating

8.14815
Rating: 
8.14815

The CSR+ Urban Organic Recycling Project is a process that returns what we now call organic waste back to the soil. Currently most organic waste is eliminated rather than recycled into a highly effective soil amendment. The elimination is by landfill or incineration in what is commonly known as waste to energy processes. Some is composted but in Toronto most of the compost facilities are many miles away as far as the Quebec border and Boston Mass.

Contestant organization: 
CSR+ Vermicast Industries Inc.
Venture partners: 

Fresh City Farms

Environmental Property Innovation Corp (EPIC)

Describe your venture: 

The CSR+ Urban Organic Recycling Project is a process that returns what we now call organic waste back to the soil. Currently most organic waste is eliminated rather than recycled into a highly effective soil amendment. The elimination is by landfill or incineration in what is commonly known as waste to energy processes. Some is composted but in Toronto most of the compost facilities are many miles away as far as the Quebec border and Boston Mass. Nature intends for  organic waste to be returned to the soil  in some manner to increase the soil fertility and thereby continue the process of providing high quality food supply. Organic discards are NOT in fact waste but rather an asset. Much like the introduction of the blue box many years ago focused on the value of things we were discarding, a renewed focus now needs to be generated as it relates to organics. The CSR+ system is fully scalable and can process organics at the point of waste creation or very near to that point. The need to transport organic waste is therefore eliminated reducing the carbon foot print. The output, worm castings is a highly effective soil amendment that can then be used close to where it was created in either urban farming enterprises or in neighbouring farming communities. The entire focus is to process organic waste close to the point of creation and use the output close to the point of production.

CSR+ Vermicast Industries has worked closely with engineering, science specialist and the end user to create a unit that is very user friendly and requiring minimal client intervention.

 The CSR+ organic recycling processes are multi stage within a sealed unit. Any organics requiring recycling are deposited into a hopper at ground level. When the hopper is full, the organics are chopped and elevated for deposit into the top of the WormWorks unit. The chopped biomass is analyzed by an on board data collection system to ensure all the correct parameters are met for the process to perform properly. The collected data is wirelessly uplinked so the CSR+'s science support staff can monitor the unit for correct operation. Outside monitoring means all technical aspects are maintained to ensure an optimum and health environment for the worms. Additionally due to the design, the system will not require users to be "worm farmers" and the installation of a WormWorks system will streamline labor at the customers site. If any data is not correct a quick call from the monitoring station to the customer can correct an issue. Gradually the biomass is transformed into a suitable worm food. The worms then participate to stabilize the biomass, their excretion being worm castings. The biomass moves from top to bottom with castings discharging through a harvest system. The system is totally self contained maintaining the biomass in an aerobic state resulting in no offensive odours. The units are also infestation and vermin proof. The unit is fully insulated and could operate outside. The standard unit to handled 2000 kg of organics per week is 4 feet high, and 5 foot square requiring a small footprint. The unit is manufactured using the finest corrosive resistant material ensure 15 year life. The air control system and irrigation systems uses minimal power and can operate using the electrical mains or by solar panels. The WormWorks unit is available and export ready.

Emissions reduction potential: 

From a GHG perspective, the actual worst case scenario is displacing organic waste already

going to composters.. A strong qualitative case can be made for GHG emission reductions from CSR+ Vermicast’s product compared to regular

composting. The following are some key advantages of CSR+ Vermicast’s product over composting:

1. Displacement of Nitrogen based fertilizers

2. Decreased water use for agricultural application (5-10x reduction over traditional

fertilizers

3. Less transportation

4. More anaerobic digestion occurs in traditional composters compared to Vermicast’s

product (anaerobic digestion creates significantly more methane than aerobic digestion)

The team: 

John Ashbee, Founder, has held management positions with several private and public companies, most recently, reWorks Inc.  John has for a number of years been involved in promoting start-up ventures employing vermicasting technology.  He is active in promoting corporate sustainability with a particular emphasis on supporting sustainable agricultural production.  After a career that has taken him to the UK, Australia, South Africa, and the US, Mr. Ashbee brings extensive knowledge of soil amendments distribution, marketing, and the capital markets to CSRplus. John graduated from Ryerson University as a Mechanical Technologist with an Aeronautic specialty. John extends his commitment to the environmental awareness by lecturing at the high school level and most recently at Trent University in Peterborough

 

Thomas Christiansen, Vice President Business Development brings to the company 20 years of sales and marketing experience with a focus in the food service industry. Thomas is a competitive leader, experienced in management, inspiration and development of a national sales team. He is experienced in procurement of profitable business, senior level account penetration and client retention. Past experience has been in the creation of Area Development networks with franchising.  Thomas is a graduate of Seneca College with a 3 year diploma in International Business.

Arunav Misra, Vice President, Sciences and Technology has 15 years of continuous advancement and expertise in waste management technical applications, products, R&D engineering with experience in both anerobic and aerobic digestion processes. Arunav was recognized as Innovator of India in 2007 by DSIR, Government of India, for research and development of Worm Compost to treat Medical Waste. He received the 2009 National Udyog Ratna Award & Certificate of Excellence with Gold Medal from the Economic Growth Society of India and was nominated for the Millennium Excellence Award for Quality with Gold Medal in 2009. Arunav has a Masters Degree in Engineering with specialty in Public Health Engineering.

 

Frank Shields, Soil Specialist. Scientific and Quality Control Officer. Frank Shields brings over 30 years of professionally recognized soil science expertise to CSRplus Vermicast Industries Inc.  He has made significant and extensive contributions to the field of compost testing, and has an extensive background in the testing of agricultural soils, potting mixes, drinking water, irrigation water and waste waters. Frank has made significant contributions to the standards established by the US Council on Composting and in 2004 he was awarded the Rufus Chaney award for his continued display of excellence in compost research.

 

Venkataswamy Reddy MSc (Agri), PGDRDM, Scientific and Quality Control Officer.  Mr. Reddy has 13 years experience in the agricultural field of production, process management and cultivation with a focus on organic production and pest management. His background with several institutions in India combined with his formal education, Master in Science in Agriculture with a nutrient focus, provides a dynamic scientific dimension to the organization.

Seeking collaborators: 
Yes
Potential collaborators should contact : 
9054878442
How will you ensure your project is self supporting within five years?: 

We have completed the financial modeling which indicates positive cash flow within the first 12 months. This is guaranteed by organic waste contracts which have been completed. This guaranteed source of raw inbound material assures profitability within the 12 month period. The process is scalable so larger volumes of organics can be processed by the addition of additional processing lines. In conjunction with the company operating a larger organic recycling program we intent marketing our on-site organic digester across Canada and the USA through our network of sales representatives.

The company offers three purchase packages, outright sale, lease to own and rental. We also offer a worm castings buy back plan for those clients who do not have an inhouse use or market for the worm castings.


 

How did you hear about ClimateSpark?: 
Friend

Comments

Rich Whate's picture

You're right, vermicomposting can work.  But I can't quite get a sense of what you're proposing - a do-it-at-home program? a larger commercial application?  Are these the worm bins of yore?

How could this proposal be improved?: 

Details, details. 

Rich 

Thanks for the comments. We are primarily focussed on an organic disposal stream of 1000 kgs per week which would be something like a vegetable store or food preparation kitchen and up. Our focus is more industrial and commercial. An example of an application would be a food store, or health care provider (Hospital). There will be no requirement for waste trucks collecting any longer but just the collection of the worm castings, the ration being about 10:1 as output. We would suggest then using the worm castings near the client or a local urban farming application or golf course turf care. The excess could of course be sent to vineyard in Niagara Lake.

JLanger's picture

Love those red wigglers -- they sure do make soil from organic material/waste.  Also, increasing soil fertility absorbs carbon from the atmosphere, so while not emission reduciton, is a key tool in the climate-saving toolkit.  

How could this proposal be improved?: 

Are there URBAN emissions being reduced through this venture?  Currently the Green Bin is diverting organic material -- is the project to take that and use worms for 'treatment' rather than the biogass strategy?  Would it be municipal project?  Or would you get organic waste from other sources and they pay you to haul it away?  Not getting a good perspectiave on the business plan.   

We had our process analysied by the Toronto Atmospheric Fund engineering consultant and some of their finding we posted in our project overview. We create no green house gasses as we are aerobic. When compared to the Green Bin I would suggest our process has several areas of GHG reduction. The first is we have No heavy trucks collecting waste at source. We do collect worm castings if not used by the operator of the system but the worm castings amount is 1/10 of the original. The Green Box program is trucked, passed through an anerobic process and then the discharge is moved again by truck many miles outside of the city. The end product of the green box program while called compost is something of low value due to heavy plastic contaminents. I can provide the full TAF evaulation but it clearly outlines a substantial reducing using the CSR+ Vermi organic waste recycling.

oilnomore's picture

You have a great team of experts. You need a concrete proposal, tangible and manageable. You have a great potential.

How could this proposal be improved?: 

Using your background experiences, you can easily come up with a realistic proposal that can produce a result that everybody can understand and be excited about. You can draw that up in a few hours, if you are familiar with local situation. There is a possibility to form an alliance with enterprisers like Urban Biomass Utilization, one of the ClimateSpark contestants.

As part of our plan we have two areas of focus, the first is the installation of our technology at the point of waste creation this can be grocery stores, food processors, health care, schools, hotels etc. The second is organic recycling centres where organics can be taken that are still close to the point of collection, these would be conventional waste companies. 

This is exactly what we need. Start thinking outside the box, using resources we already have and keeping things local. Simply amazing that 1000 kgs per week can be composted in 1 area. This is a Gravy Train I would get on board!! 

Thanks, not only composted but transformed into a more valuable soil amendment. The efficacy of worm castings significantly outperforms compost. As an example worm castings contain 30+ trace mineral that were created by the worm gut. Additionally the worm cast is surrounded by a membrane secretion which makes the cast hydrophylic. Worm casts contain 5 - 9 times the amount of water than top soil and releases the water as the plant requires it. The use of castings in a growing medium mix germinates seeds more quickly, creates a healthier and intense root ball and more fruit or product per plant. From an income perspective where high quality compost produces an income stream of $35 per ton, worm castings demand $300 - $2000 per ton.

I like where you are going with this.  It makes sense and it a tangible project.  I would like to see more of a strategic plan of how this can self sustain itself.

How could this proposal be improved?: 

What companies would you need to team up with to make this happen?

The project has two sustainability aspects. The first of course is environmental whereby we are using a process to recycle to organics back to a high value soil supplement i.e. worm castings. The second is the financial sustainable model and this can be divided into two areas. The first is the cost of disposing of organic material which is expensive. The cost has easily doubled in the past five years and will continue to become more expensive. For the client who purchases the unit for on site use there is an elimination of their organic disposal charges. An example might be a larger grocery store with an organic disposal cost of $50,000 per year (550,000 kg per year). After a 60 months lease to purchase where the lease is paid with the current waste disposal dollars the annual fee is eliminated. Additionally there is a worm castings product being produced which adds a second revenue stream. The other application would be someone in the waste business and in that scenario they have two revenue streams, one the taking of waste (tipping fee) and then the sale of the worm castings.

What's the plan that you're proposing with this product?  I think you've got a great idea here, but what is your idea on how this venture would be rolled out in Toronto as a result of this?

Toronto is unique in that we are very good at source seperating or material especially organics. What we are not so good at is the final disposition of recycling. Mort Source Seperated Organics from Toronto is trucked miles from Toronto to land fill, anerobic digestion sites or compost sites. Destination like Niagara Penisula, Welland, Ontario, London, Quebec and Boston. In some of these cases compost is created that is high quality and in some cases of lower quality. In all cases there is a huge carbon foot print in the moving of the product to the processing centres and increased if the process is landfill disposed or even compost. The best solution is to recycle the organics close to the point of creation with the minimum of footprint and use the output as a growing medium close to the point of creation.

I think the concept is terrific.  Moreover, I believe that this needs to be part of policy discussions at all levels of government.  Implementing a vermicompost program should be large scale - not only will it reduce landfills, it will also generate revenue streams (cost recovery) and benefit the environment.

To make this stronger, the proposal needs to continue pushing the business case for municipal / provincial support.  I want to see a VermBox next to my BlueBox and GreenBox at curbside.   Good luck!

Tyson

A comprehensive government policy is a good idea for new emerging green initatives. We see the recycling of organics much like the implemntation of the BlueBox programs 25+ years ago. At that time little was recycled but with the bluebox program waste diversion went mainstream. Communities found that what they were discarding previously now had a value. We believe the GreenBox or seperated organics will start to play a similar roll and as importantly. Previously discarded organics have a real value.

Lon's picture

I think vermicasting will play a key part of the sustainability solution in the future.  Is there any way of partnering with the city, or even a city councilor for a particular ward?  Scaling would likely make this more viable.

Lon

Thanks for that suggestion. We actually looked at two project site, one was an old transfer station mothballed by the city. In that regard we were assisted by a City Council but alas were a bit late as a developer has put a bid on the site. The second location was Downsview Park in conjuction with an urban farming extension of the park. This site is perfect because of its central location and the fact the park is already involved in sustainability projects. The Downsview project is still under consideration. We will take your suggest seriously however and explore other City opportunities

Vermi-composting and waste management is a great idea

How could this proposal be improved?: 

More specifics about locations and pickup of organic material/enduse of compost/bio-gas collection would help convey the project scale and strengths.  Is project viable using the existing greenbin stream?

 

At the moment our focus has been commercial source seperated organics. The reason is its predominately clean and devoid of contaminents. If by greenbin stream one is referring to commercial, i.e. grocery stores, hotels, food procesors, vegetable stores, resturant then these are all possible organic waste sources. The greenbox from some municipalities may be useable but it depends on the contaminent mix. We are looking at organics and any supply that is heavy in plastic contaminents is not ideal. We are looking to recycle organics back to a useable agricultural product, and plastic contaminents cause issues. Small quantities of contaminets can be removed via the process but larger contaminents such as diapers etc are problematic. Within Toronto there is a massive supply of Commerical Soure Seperated organics in fact that is the largest source.

This proposal is useful and efficient but it needs the help of the government

We agree with that position. Government can always help alternative solutions. In other areas governments have implemented a landfill tax. This was the driving force in Europe for the implementation of alternative solutions. Where the landfill disposal costs are low alternative processes are handicapped. There is discussions taking place for Ontario to implement a landfill tax which will be helpful. We are also assisted at the moment by the increasing cost of synthetic fertilizers. As these cost continue to grow alternative soil supplements like worm castings become a competative alternative.

tmann6's picture

Back in time when Toronto was suffering from garbage crisis because of Boston land fill would'nt take our waste, now with the issue of selling 5 cents a plasstic bag .The government now should think about this proposal to be a great opurtunity for Toronto to get back on the top. Recycling the waste and eliminating waste that is not needed at all.The municiple government should really be concerned about this issue and think to make this organization into a reallity process. Pros : Recycling waste newsprint, cardboard,glass and metal can reduce carbon dioxide emissions .           Recycling helps reducing pollution by 95% in the wolrd.
Cons:  people recycle things that should not be recycled and it is very bad.
                          

How could this proposal be improved?: 

This proposal will help out the municiple government with better improvement and better environment. We should recycle everyday and help protect the mother earth.

You make very valid statements. Many years ago municipalities implemented the blue box program that became the norm here and around the world. We believe it's time for the greenbox program to take the same dynamic especially as food sustainability becomes more an issue. Recyling of plastics, paper, cardboard etc is important and also a revenue stream. The recycling of organics can become the same. Organics recycled into the correct form becomes an income stream and a valuable asset. The Greenbox is elivated to the same level as the Blue Box

This is a great proposal with a number of income streams and/or potential cost savings to ensure it's finanical sustainability. 

Not only does it create a valuable option for the processing of organic waste but it also creates a viable income stream from the output.  This is something that would definitely be of interest not only to the private sector but also to municipalities. 

I like that this gives private businesses the opportunity to create an income stream from their waste processes, a key motivator to get private industry to change over from the current waste-model.

I think it makes a ton of sense to view organic waste as an asset rather than a liability or a cost, and your solution sounds like an excellent way to release the value locked up in the organic waste asset.  I am also impressed by the credentials of the team. I strongly believe that these kind of opportunities - where tangible benefits can be realised for the environment whilst generating an income stream - should be embraced by the community.

A really innovative proposal... Would love to see it work.

Obvious solution to a growing problem.  Timely too!

Currently over 40% of what is grown is thrown away. To grow this produce required nutrients from the earth. In the past organics were recycled and returned to the ground to add the nutrients back. Modern day practises in urban areas where a large percentage of food waste is created started discarding the organics via landfill or incineration. More recently efforts have been make to compost the organic discards but generally these operations are far from the urban community. What is required is a method of recycling organic close to the point of waste creation and then further be able to produce an end product that can be used as a highly effective soil amendment close to the urban area. The CSR+ WormWorks unit and process addresses both those activities.

I see the Industrial/Commercial application.  How do you envision a municipality using your system?

 

One of the biggest issues a municipality has is the disposal of sewage solids or cake. This by far is one of the largest organic waste streams and of course is one not mentioned in the main stream. Currently many municipalities land apply sewage sludge or cake. Land applying of this material is becoming a major health concern. There is many examples in other world juristiction where the use of worms has created a safer land application product. We envision the CSR+ Worm Works unit and process to play a part in the human biosolids recycling industry.

the strenghts of this project  is the recycling process of waste materials into useful forms....

its a great outcome for waste management.....

How could this proposal be improved?: 

It can be improved by  assistance from ngo's and many other social welfare organisation...

As a human we should know the duties and to safeguard our environment from harmful hazards from the waste deposited ... 

 

 

The recycling of organic into a useful soil amendment is a global issue. World wide we dispose of over 40% of everything we grow. If this was recycled into worm castings and used to enhance the world soils it would assist in eleveating poverty by providing low cost organic matter to increase yields.

One can make the case that a resort in a holiday destination could recycle their organics on site producing worm castings that can then be given to the local farmers. In turn the local farmers grow produce to be sold to the hotel. The hotel wins by eliminating their waste cost and they in turn support the local agricultural communisty

 

 

Credible team, innovative product.

This proposal has a number of positives not least of which is that it creates sustainable commercial products as a result of the program.  Great idea.

this project is very good. the strenght of this project is recylcing the waste and reuse it.

How could this proposal be improved?: 

this could be improved by recycling wastes more and converting it to use material again.

This is an important comments in that is refocussed the idea of organics as valuable. In reality it is not organic "waste" but rather an organic "asset". 

Comment Feeds, No of Comment : 36
Subscribe to Comment Feeds

The ClimateSpark Social Venture Challenge is a project of:

Partners

Our sponsors:

Our Sponsors