Green4Good: Stopping Climate Change One Computer at a Time (Finalist)

Community Rating

5.62069
Rating: 
5.62069

What it Does

Green4Good achieves environmental and social benefits by secure refurbishment and re-use of IT assets (desktops and notebooks) that would traditionally have gone to long-term storage or been recycled while raising money for charities through the proceeds of the asset resale.

Environmental Benefits

Contestant organization: 
Compugen Finance, Inc.
Venture partners: 

Green4Good is designed and managed by Compugen Finance Inc. and supported by Earth Rangers, and other Canadian organizations that focus on environmental impacts of human activities. Among participants in the program is TD Bank.

Describe your venture: 

What it Does

Green4Good achieves environmental and social benefits by secure refurbishment and re-use of IT assets (desktops and notebooks) that would traditionally have gone to long-term storage or been recycled while raising money for charities through the proceeds of the asset resale.

Environmental Benefits

The environmental benefits are related to deferral of manufacturing of new equipment (the productive life of the asset may be extended by years in the hands of end-users with no need to purchase new equipment every two to three years). Manufacturing of new computers has huge environmental costs.

Technology and Social Ecosystem

Who needs to dispose of these assets? Canadian enterprises that manage hundreds or thousands of desktop or notebook computers. As a rule these enterprises apply refresh cycles for their equipment that correspond to their asset depreciation schedules as well as addressing their need for consistency in hardware profiles—its more efficient to manage and maintain a large class of identical assets than it is to manage a very heterogeneous environment. Once the assets are due for a refresh, they need to be removed from circulation and, until Green4Good, were often warehoused as a way of keeping any private data they contained out of the wrong hands and avoiding the unreliable grey market in used IT equipment.

With Green4Good, secure, efficient asset refurbishment and ultimate resale has become the preferred method of passing these decommissioned assets out of the enterprise environment, safely into the ISO-certified configuration environment of Compugen where they are wiped, cleaned, given legal, licensed operating systems, and warranted, mostly for consumer end-users. Only about 10 percent of assets are found to be irreparable and only these are destined for environmentally responsible recycling. Equipment never goes to landfill.

Thus Green4Good serves both the market for responsible end-of-life asset disposal and the environmental concerns of a growing number of non-profits, charities and Canadian for-profit businesses. For example, Green4Good has major sponsorship from Hewlett-Packard Canada and Sims Recycling, and strategic partnership with World Wildlife Fund, Friends of the Earth , Earth Rangers  and Air Miles, which are all Advocates of Green4Good.

The benefits are local and global, in terms of the climate change impact from reduced GHG emissions and the opportunities afforded businesses to donate the proceeds to a charity of their choice.

Supplementary Report on Innovation

One of the most innovative components of the program, and one that speaks to the need for creative partnerships, is the ability of individuals purchasing refurbished equipment to acquire Air Miles for their purchase. It is noted elsewhere that Air Miles has done email campaigns to raise awareness of Green4Good; it is a powerful marketing agent in this effort through its unmatched ability to reach consumers, to understand their behaviour and to provide excellent incentives.

Also on the theme of marketing and the need for creative partnership, we plan to promote Green Days with the corporations participating in Green4Good in an effort to engage their employees to "empty their closets , basements and garages" of their old technology. We will provide a bin at the employee’s office on a particular day to collect and take away all of their aged IT assets. For many people who have acquired numerous personal computers over the years, this will be a true boon. A nominal donation will be asked of the employee that will go to a charity.

Working with our environmental partner Earth Rangers we will provide resources to help them discuss the G4G program when they visit the schools across the GTA, thus educating children on the benefit of re-use over recycling.

 

Emissions reduction potential: 

Addressing Climate Change

According to a 2003 UN study (pdf), the manufacture of one desktop computer requires 22 Kg of chemicals, 1.5 tonnes of water, and 240 Kg of fossil fuels—about 10 times the weight of the computer itself. (In contrast, new refrigerators and cars require approximately their own weight in fossil fuels.) Further, by one estimate, four fifths of the energy consumed by a computer over its lifetime is associated with its manufacture. Extending the life of a computer, thereby deferring the manufacture of a new one, is good environmental stewardship.

Green4Good is promoting re-use, not recycle.

Since inception, Green4Good has directed about 135,000 computers into reuse that were mostly destined for recycling. A conservative estimate of fossil fuel reduction achieved would be 2,400,000 Kg (or 2400 tonnes), resulting in signficant reduction in GHG emissions.

Assuming gasoline as a fossil fuel, the 2400 tonnes of fossil fuel associated with the manufacture of, for example, 100,000 PCs equates to 17,688,000 litres of gasoline (.737 Kg / Litre), which produces by the calculator provided at www.toronto.ca/taf/quant_policy_approach.htm 2.3 x 17 688 000 Kg of CO2 = 40 682 400 Kg. Other fuels would produce worse or better results, and different assumptions would yield varying reductions of CO2. However, the net reduction in CO2 emissions from this initiative must be very substantial, in the millions of Kilograms.

While Toronto is not a centre of PC or PC-component manufacturing, we recognize that the impacts of CO2 on climate change are global and not local. A sustained reduction of CO2 emissions in China or Japan, for example, is as important to climate change as it would be if it took place in Etobicoke or Scarborough.

Supplementary Information

The Green4Good program is targeting an additional 100 000 computers for the next twelve months. Given current diversion data, that would amount to an additional 90 000 computers diverted from recycling and an estimated CO2 reduction (based on the above numbers) of over 30 000 000 Kg.

Challenges

We believe that as the program matures and the asset mix changes with addition of new partners (businesses seeking to dispose of assets and others seeking to redistribute refurbished assets) there will be challenges to meet these CO2 reduction targerts: the ratio of refurbish to recycle could change because of the age or condition of the assets; the consumer marketplace could change either beneficially or prejudicially towards refurbished assets. There will be significant work involved in adapting the marketing strategies both at the asset acquisition end and at the disposition end of the process.

We are aware that the novelty of Green4Good may contribute to some of the uptake and believe that consistent communications through the channels already mentioned using a combination of existing and new marketing material will be critical to maintaining momentum. Awards nominations, for example, require resources and matching grants from partners and other sources of funding will be helpful in carrying the process forward. Whether or not Green4Good wins a Gold medal at the Microsoft Canadian Impact Awards later this month, a submission will need to be made to the international forum for Microsoft Partner awards, the Worldwide Partner Conference, which takes place in July each year. A win or honourable mention at the Worldwide Partner Conference would practically guarantee that the program would be adopted / adapted by other Microsoft partners outside of Canada on a scale that could dwarf what Green4Good is doing here. This would be a huge win for the environment globally.

 

The team: 

Business Sustainability Model

As described in response to Question 1, above, the program is sustainable and highly successful because it matches environmental and social goals of for-profit donors with needs and aspirations of non-profits. Its greatest exponents are drawn from both sides of this equation.

Through its network of sponsors, advocates and beneficiaries (both for-profit and non-profit), Green4Good is serving to evangelize for green-house-gas emission reductions, and show donors how to make substantial contributions to charities they target for support, be they women’s shelters, educational concerns, international development projects or local initiatives. Charities and projects benefiting have included: Megan’s Walk; Mexican School (CNRL); Outreach Zanzibar; Project Childcare; RCMP Foundation; Reach for the Rainbow; Sick Kids; Bereaved Families of Ontario; Building Bridges; Unison Community Services; Angel Foundation for Learning; Bowmanville Valley Co-Op; CCFAA; Compugen Kids; Earth Rangers; Friends of the Earth; Homeward Bound; Impact Ministries; Massey Centre; Maya Fund. The opportunities are vast as the charities are targeted completely at the discretion of the donors.

Through these same sponsors, advocates and beneficiaries, Green4Good has gained significant presence in the Canadian marketplace. Here are some of the ways in which the program has gained recognition and support:

Additional coverage continues through web-based and email campaigns such as:

Why is Green4Good in the Right Hands?

Compugen Inc. through its complete enterprise-level IT lifecycle services, and Compugen Finance, through its IT leasing and recycling capabilities, both have strong relationships with large Canadian enterprises that are good stewards of their IT assets, so that when these assets come up for renewal they have significant residual value. Traditionally, large enterprises have been concerned with security and privacy, so have not been willing to part with decommissioned assets, but have preferred to store them securely so no private data could ever inadvertently be shared. The costs of storage, while high, were considered less than the cost of privacy breaches or the cost of secure wiping and disposal. Compugen, with 30 years’ experience in the IT business, has audited processes and procedures, and efficiencies in its operations that permit a high level of confidence and major cost savings over other methods of asset disposition. Enterprises thus see a double win in assigning these decommissioned assets to a refurbishment stream through CFI, as the assets have substantial residual value in the context of this Compugen-engineered Green4Good program. Ninety percent of the assets entering the stream are able to be refurbished, rather than recycled. Refurbished assets, properly re-licenced and guaranteed, are typically resold through the consumer market at a significant discount from the price of new equipment.

Compugen was Canada’s first Microsoft Authorized Refurbisher, giving it access to standard Microsoft operating system licenses at reduced cost to the purchaser. Since the value of such depreciated assets cannot show up on the corporate balance sheet, it can be directed to a charity of choice as cash or credits toward acquisition of newer more efficient IT equipment. And, the reduced carbon footprint associated with deferred computer manufacturing—a computer kept in operation is a new computer not built—is of particular interest to Compugen’s partners in the non-profit and charitable sectors with a focus on GHG and its negative impact on climate stability. We all benefit when businesses can find ways, such as through Green4Good, to reduce the environmental impact of their operations, and benefit a number of other social concerns through direct donation of cash or credits to acquire modern, more efficient assets, that they would otherwise acquire anyway but at a higher cost.

Our Local Team

Additional Supporting Information

Green4Good is being positioned for greater acclaim through selective nomination to national and international awards programs, such as Microsoft's Canadian Impact Awards, for which it has been selected as a finalist in the category Sustainability Partner of the Year.

The growth of this program will come primarily through strategic alignment with our business partners. For example, Hewlett-Packard Canada has recently renewed its annual sponsorship of the program and Ingram Micro, a major distributor of computer technology, has partnered with Green4Good to promote the program through their network of several thousand resellers across Canada. In this way the message of Green4Good will reach thousands of Canadian corporations, many of whom have significant footprints in the GTA. Our recycling partners are also recognizing that Green4Good can help divert equipment obtained outside of the Green4Good program from the recycle to the refurbish stream. They are thus becoming suppliers of product into the program for refurbishment that would otherwise end up as plastic and metal for recycling owing to ignorance of its true value.

Seeking collaborators: 
No
Potential collaborators should contact : 
Steve Glover, Senior VP, Compugen Finance, [email protected]
How will you ensure your project is self supporting within five years?: 

The project is currently self-supporting, and the climate change benefits can only increase with greater refurbishment uptake by local, regional and national businesses looking both for positive environmental impact and responsible ways of disposing of their retired computer equipment, with a charitable twist!

Supplementary Note about Sustainability

As alluded to above, there is a requirement to keep the communication with existing and prospective partners fresh and compelling. There is no prospect of the marketplace for refurbishment drying up as the stream is steady with enterprise refresh cycles bringing on line a constant supply of systems requiring some form of disposition. It is still the case that the vast majority of systems are disposed of through less imaginative channels than that offered by Green4Good. It is our challenge to find resources to communicate our value from the environmental, charitable and business perspectives. The opportunity is huge and we have just started.

 

How did you hear about ClimateSpark?: 
We heard about ClimateSpark from our friends at BetterTheWorld.ca

Comments

Who exactly would use the old computers, and what would they use them for?

I can see a bit of a market for students and underpriviledged who can't afford the latest and greatest, but given the improved performance, smaller form factors, and lower power consumption of newer computers, I think you'd need a way to market the used computers as desireable.  Either as heaters in the winter or something else.

Because the old computers are securely wiped of private information, provisioned with a legal OS and refurbished to the point where they can be backed by a warranty, they can be a) sold to the retail market (major vendors do carry fully reconditioned and warranted used computers for sale for less than the price of new) b) sold to departments of businesses where up-to-date computing power is not critical to business process (for example, where they are used for data entry). In the latter case, the assurance of consistent image, warranty and on-site repair should anything fail support the business case for such lower-priced, fully legal systems. Whether the market will continue to need the current volume of refurbished equipment is a question; but we have to date had not problem reselling what can be refurbished through these channels.

RogerB's picture

I'm not sure if there's a demand for older computers.  Nowdays a new computer running 2-3x as fast is 50-70% of one purchased just a couple years ago.  Can others benefit from old technology, or does that just keep them at a disadvantage.... especially with things like OLPC around.

Perhaps a focus on recycling would be simpler/more appropriate?   Also, I would imagine the carbon footprint on transporting computers could be problematic.

and I'm not sure I see the logistical answer in terms of how you get the old computers in the first place.  The City of Toronto already accepts these via garbage collection.... how would you make it 'easy' for diversion.?

How could this proposal be improved?: 

a focus on recycling might be more appropriate given the rate at which technology evolves.

080808's picture

Great point about of how the demand of older computers is not the same as in years gone by, were there was a demand for older computers in 3rd world countries.

How could this proposal be improved?: 

Recyle efforts would defiantly be an advantageous step

A reviewer suggests there is a supply problem with old computers and we might better focus on recycling.

First, our focus is in reducing the amount of recycling, or at least delaying it by years. A delay in recycling is environmentally beneficial. The potential additional cost in energy consumption from running old technology is far exceeded by the environmental cost of manufacturing a new piece of equipment.

Our current supply is solid and there is current demand from corporate clients needing responsible ways of decommissioning old assets. Supply constraint may become relevant in the future, but we don't see this as likely. We see more of an issue potentially with what other reviewers have flagged as an issue: market demand for refurbished equipment. As the price of new equipment falls, there is a squeeze on potential market for refurbished computers. Our processes are highly efficient so right now we can still offer a refurbished PC at a considerable savings over the price of an equivalent new PC. This option is attractive to individual end users as well as corporations with specific departmental needs around data entry, for example, where the savings on one PC can be multiplied by the hundreds. 

If you take the time to read their web site it appears that the computers that they are refurbishing and re-using are corporate computers and are really only 3 years old. That means that they are still pretty current for most applications and would work quite well. If you look into the future 3 years from now they would re-using todays computers which not only perform well but are energy efficient thus allaying some-one's energy concerns. Well thought out !

How could this proposal be improved?: 

More emphasis should also be made to highlight the value that they are generating for charities. It looks like it is a big part of their value ( creating monies for charities ).

With more partnerships and more used computers landing at your doorstep, how can you scale up and handle the increased volumes as this venture grows? I imagine this is a very labour-intensive process.

The issue Green4Good addresses is an important one, the vast amount of e-waste needs to be managed more sustainably.  I think you are on the right track working with major technology providers. 

How could this proposal be improved?: 

Advocating for and managing an extended producer responsibility program that includes a surcharge at initial purchase to cover end of life disposal and recycling is a system that North America really needs to work on.  Other jurisdictions (eu) have had some effective success with systems that see funding earmarked from the purchase ensure that recycling (refurbishment?) happens with a high degree of participation - rebates/deposits could help with this type of system.

I love it! There's definitely a need for this - it reminds me of freecycle.

How could this proposal be improved?: 

How do you plan to use/distribute the computers effectively? 

Zell's picture

You have stated that

"Green4Good has directed about 135,000 computers into reuse that were mostly destined for recycling. A conservative estimate of fossil fuel reduction achieved would be 2,400,000 Kg (or 2400 tonnes), resulting in significant reduction in GHG emissions."

When does Moore’s Law of hardware become obsolete come into factor to your turn over rate?

Transportation of old equipment to developing worlds might be a good solution to reusing old computers, but in this world the developing worlds are  using Android based computers in regular phones with infrared screens and keypads.

It is wrong to give old technology to developing worlds, instead we should catapult them into the 21st Century so that they can harness the power of the new.

 

 

How could this proposal be improved?: 

Why not turn old equipment into new ones by getting your partners HP to donate new up to date computers.

Perhaps we must build for future generations to have more of a life cycle for our electronic equipment than to reuse and re-buy once a year.

 

Keir Brownstone's picture

I am a big fan of recycling on all fronts, but in this case there is a fly in the ointment. My conern here is that the program is in fact increasing carbon emissions rather than reducing by recycling inefficient technology. I would like to see the case made in the proposal to prove me wrong (and would be happy to be proven so).

What that would look like is a comparison between energy consumption of old versus new and the energy used to recycle as compared to building new products. I am very much hoping that the recycled product would win, but without doing that calculation we may be adding to the problem rather than helping it.

Beyond that it would be nice to see an education component included in the program that helped folks who are the recipients of product learn how to reduce energy consumption at the same time. For example, include a power bar with instructions.

slyder's picture

When it comes to refurbish or make anew the numbers can be pretty tight. 

How could this proposal be improved?: 

Some good math on the subject would help to clarify.

Williams and Kuehn (Computers and the Environment: Understanding and Managing their Impacts (Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers), suggest that 75 per cent of the typical PC lifetime energy consumption is taken up by manufacturing (cited by, for example, http://forums.techsoup.org/cs/community/b/tsblog/archive/2011/11/01/envi....)  

To be sure, as manufacturing processes improve, the picture is likely to change. Newer PCs are much more energy efficient than older ones. The EPEAT standards are helping environmentally conscientious purchasers to make responsible buying decisions for new PCs. Imposition of corporate standards (or the use of power bars in the home or small business office) can reduce the impact of operations substantially even for older more power hungry equipment. One reviewer suggested that a responsible approach to marketing of used, refurbished equipment could include at a minimum some literature about how to reduce power consumption and therefore GHG emissions. This is a suggestion that we are taking under advisement. 

From the GHG emissions perspective, the game could be changed by dramatically improved manufacturing, changes in components, etc. The current picture still favours refurbishment over new manufacturing by a signficiant margin. 

We acknowledge that the big unknown is the long-term viability of the refurbished market in the face of pressure from radically redesigned, low-priced, EPEAT Gold certified and Energy Star certified new equipment. 

However, our program is not about recycling, and aims to defer this result by years. If we cannot continue to defer recycling, then we would be involved in a different program, which would look quite different from Green4Good.

 

I've got mixed feelings on this proposal. 

The business model assumes that the refurbished computers replace the need to purchase a new computer. 

#1. I'm wondering if this is indeed the case or if the market for these computers is different from the "new computer market." More on this below.

#2. While generally it's better to reuse than to recycle – with older electronics it may mean that there is an energy penalty to pay by keeping older models working.  So while it saves the production of a new computer – the energy Energy slife cycle cost may not be so different because of the greater energy consumption issue.

If the price of the refurbished computers is low enough then it opens up opportunities for under privileged individuals to gain access to technology and to potential make a better life for themselves.  So this proposal may not be about the replacement of new computer but opening up a new market for computers.  This has huge societal benefits but then it limits the emission reduction potential.

I'd like to see some "number crunching of energy use" and some market analysis on who the potential clients are before I make a firm judgement on this.

Finally, there appears to be little "social" benefit connection to this proposal.  While it's true that a portion of the sales is donated to charity – any company can provide that social benefit.  A partnering with a social service organization, perhaps for training of IT skills to underprivedged individuals, would strengthen this proposal.

This is a great idea of using old or scrap computer or computer parts. This will definitely save natural resources and save space for disposal of scrap items.

How could this proposal be improved?: 

This reminds me the saying "Best from Waste". Absolutely In this globalized world we have to save natural resources for future generation. Computer parts can be recycled and at least we can recycle plastic of computer to make new computer.

i've recycled hundreds of thousands of dollars woorth of computers and feel guilty whenever I do but you have a tough job in front of you because no one wants old technology.

How could this proposal be improved?: 

I do think it needs more emphasis on recycling... but good luck.

This might not be the best environment for this venture. As iterated by others, there may not be the demand by the non-profit sector here in Toronto for older technology.

How could this proposal be improved?: 

Maybe consider partnering with organizations such as OLPC.

Refurbish them into servers instead?

GreenHeroes's picture

This proposal does address a serious environmental problem/question around the disposal and re-use of computers - If anyone has seen the movie Manufactured Landscapes which is about the work of  Edward Burtynsky - this problem is certainly made light of. So certainly it is relevant.  

How could this proposal be improved?: 

This proposal is strong and well developed - it could perhaps be shortened slightly but it is quite comprehensive.

I really like the idea of diverting and refurbishing them. Some units would be so outdated they would almost be useless.

How could this proposal be improved?: 

Could an upgrading of these units be done? Possibly getting some parts donated to accomplish this?

Comment Feeds, No of Comment : 19
Subscribe to Comment Feeds

The ClimateSpark Social Venture Challenge is a project of:

Partners

Our sponsors:

Our Sponsors